Connecticut’s Incubator Program: Is Your Startup Missing Out?
August 23, 2010 at 11:00 am | Posted in Entrepreneurship, General Interest Connecticut, Venture Funding | 1 CommentTags: CBIN, Connecticut based startup, connecticut business incubator network, startup grant, startup resources
The State of Connecticut is working to become a more appealing state for startups looking for a home. Its programs, directed through various groups, target those who are seeking resources, from seed capital to physical space to intellectual capital. Part of that supporting structure is the Connecticut Business Incubator Network (CBIN), with seven participating incubator programs and total of ten facilities throughout the state. About 45 businesses call these incubators home.
The appeal of locating in an incubator, beyond satisfying the need for a physical location other than your home office or a local coffee shop (where plenty of great startups begin), is access to other resources the state provides, some only to incubator residents.
For example, technology-related startups located in a qualified incubator may apply to receive a grant of up to $50,000, a significant amount of non-dilutive seed capital to help a startup blossom. We’ve recently heard that the funding cap for that grant may be reduced to about 50% – but even at that reduced level, capital in the form of grant funding can be really helpful. Our staff recently was made aware the grant program, which had been stalled out for almost one year, is now being restarted.
Incubators provide lots of intangible benefits to residents, like camaraderie and access to advice, but access to grant funding may just be a must-have.
If you have any further questions regarding grant program and CBIN in general, you can contact Paul Striebel at pstriebel@ccat.us
The Web Is Dead…But The Internet Isn’t. Now Pay Up.
August 18, 2010 at 4:00 pm | Posted in Mobile Computing, Trends | Leave a CommentTags: the web is dead, future of the web, sensor computing, fee for software business models
Not so long ago, it seemed that all software and services would be free – paid for by advertisers eager to get their wares in front of the eyeballs of web-ravenous consumers. Google, for example, has ridden this wave in more ways than one.
But today, the implications of the shift to new computing form factors (smartphones, ebook readers, and “tablets” like the iPad), and new, highly integrated device/software/content platforms is becoming clear.
It’s killing the web. But it may just bring balance back to the internet, world of business models, and company financial statements.
Yesterday’s Wired Magazine article, The Web Is Dead. Long Live the Internet, sums it up well. “You wake up and check your email on your bedside iPad — that’s one app. During breakfast you browse Facebook, Twitter, and The New York Times — three more apps. On the way to the office, you listen to a podcast on your smartphone. Another app. At work, you scroll through RSS feeds in a reader and have Skype and IM conversations. More apps. At the end of the day, you come home, make dinner while listening to Pandora, play some games on Xbox Live, and watch a movie on Netflix’s streaming service.”
Rather than a browser-centric, open experience, more semi-closed and device specific experiences are defining our internet experience these days – and the likely explosion of embedded systems and sensor computing will only strengthen this trend.
It may not be an overstatement that Steve Jobs and Apple has done far more for this revolution than any other company. By providing an insanely compelling…uh, mp3 player…they not only won the fruits of premium pricing, but they also gained an installed base primed for backward integration into content. They became a music retailer – in spite of complaints about DRM, etc. – and made it profitable to sell music again after the Napster era.
iTunes video services repeated this success in the area of movies – Netflix had already gutted countless strip mall video stores across the country. Combined with Netflix’s streaming service and sites like Hulu (paid services coming out soon), a profitable model for “video rentals” returned.
And now Apple is making the three-peat happen in area of publishing with its iPad – eBooks are actually flying off the shelves in a way they haven’t in spite of years of availability online. For software providers like Microsoft and Google who are more open in terms of the devices and parties who implement their software, there’s a cautionary note in this – being an “app” producer may or may not be the really lucrative part of the equation, and control of the right parts of the equation might just be indispensable to success.
The truth is, this model has been silently alive for a number of years in hardcore gaming. Software is developed for a specific device platform, and internet and client-side features are blended into a user-centric experience. Or, as Wired puts it, it is clear we’re headed for “a post-HTML environment.”
Maybe it’s already here?
A Faster Internet? Flow Switching
August 17, 2010 at 6:27 pm | Posted in Trends | Leave a CommentTags: faster internet, fiber optic, flow switching, mit
Remember when you first used a web browser? First sent an email?
There was a thrill you felt, you were exhilarated by the possibilities (yes, even on dial-up).
You were able to access more resources than imaginable simply by owning a computer and a phone jack. But, very quickly I’m sure, you began to run up against the constraints. Sure, my laptop has a 10MB hard drive, but dial-up is sooooo slow. Gag me with a spoon.
Even in the age of 1T (terabyte) hard drives, fiber optic speeds, and $200 devices with the power of an early Cray supercomputer, we have our complaints.
Well, like construction equipment, cars, and toilet paper, the Internet has gone through many iterations. And soon, we may witness another chapter in the history of the Internet: flow switching.
While the US government, Google, and others push to overhaul our nation’s foundation infrastructure, MIT researchers led by Vincent Chan are refining a technique called “optical flow switching” is innovating around a crucial bottleneck in the pathways through the internet – the router.
In Al Gore’s famous analogy and land grab, information flowed down highways – and that analogy is apt. Information or requests from a server or other device are converted to optical signals, and head off to their destination. But these packets of information have to navigate intersections where decisions have to be made about where to send it.
Even with fiber optic cabling between these intersections, routers have to convert fast optical signals to slower electrical signals to ensure they are properly routed. And this eats up time. And not only is flow switching faster – because there is no conversion to electrical signals, it is more energy efficient. This additional speed will not only satisfy our unquenchable desire for computing speed, but will, just as other internet improvements have, make new innovations possible.
Entrepreneur Profile: Hans Schoenburg, GiftFlow
August 15, 2010 at 6:20 pm | Posted in Enterpreneur Profiles, Entrepreneurship | 1 CommentTags: giftflow, hans schoenburg, new haven startup
We hear it every day in the news – small business drives the growth and job creation in our economy.
Independent’s Entrepreneur Profiles celebrates the people out there changing the world every day. We ask each entrepreneur eight questions to give us a little insight into their vision of the future, and their take on building a company.
This month, we feature Hans Schoenburg, co-founder of GiftFlow, a New Haven-based startup attempting to change the way we think about giving and community.
Eight Questions for Hans
1. What does your company do?
GiftFlow strengthens community interdependence, prevents waste and reduces costs. It connects users into an online gift economy and sharing network where people give or share what they can to get what they need. Users post on their profile a list of whatever goods and services they need and a list of what they can give or share. This can range from an hour of volunteer time to a used bicycle. While the site is still in development, our goal is to build a market of free stuff, a social network of trust, and a community of giving and sharing.
Our main strategy is to build partnerships with non-profits and community organizations. By listing their needs on GiftFlow, they can receive the direct support of their community members. These groups are the nodes of our neighborhood networks and will provide a strong foundation for the GiftFlow community.
We plan to take the “free-list” function of successful sites like Freecycle and Craigslist and channel it into a social network. Stuff that is currently given away to strangers through these largely anonymous sites will now flow through a social network, building a strong interdependent community.
Here is a video of what exactly GiftFlow does.
2. When did you start your company? Why did you decide to start your company?
The members of the GiftFlow team all came to the project for their own reasons, so I’ll just speak for mine. At Yale I studied economic anthropology and came across accounts of Malian gift economies by regional anthropologists. Giving without expectation of immediate return, many people in Mali participate in a below-the-radar gift economy that includes anything from a meal for a neighbor, change for bus fare, child care or food from the garden. They see the gift as a string, connecting families, friends and neighbors in a web of mutual support.
Raised on the Internet, I realized that a gift economy could be supported by an online social network. The Internet could be serve as the memory bank for the community’s informal giving and sharing. A website could strengthen and formalize what is already happening in communities around the world.
GiftFlow started to grow as I met more people passionate about the same idea. Our team now includes Cris, Brandon, Jarus and Regina as well as many more supporters.
3. What are your funding sources?
We are a non-profit. So far our funding has come from various fellowships, grants and donations. Our revenue model will be an optional “Verified Donation” that will give users a “Verified” icon on their profile and preference in search results. We expect to charge $20.![]()
4. What have the top 3 challenges have been in your start-up process?
First, recruiting developers. Our lead developer Brandon Jackson is the MVP of our effort right now, while the rest of our team is working hard to build a network of supporters.
Second, developing a coherent brand and message. While we’ve always agreed on the functionality of the website, how we describe it to the public has been a long, and very useful, debate.
Third, operating on a shoe-string budget. Starting a non-profit website is not easy.
5. Define “entrepreneur”
Someone who is not afraid to work outside of the safety of established organizations and enjoys working with an interdependent small group.
6. Read any good books lately?
The Gift by Lewis Hyde. It is a powerful explanation of the potential of gift-giving to connect communities. Here is a great quote:
“Circular giving differs from reciprocal giving in several ways. First, when the gift moves in a circle, no one ever receives it from the same person she gives it to…When the gift moves in a circle its motion is beyond the control of the personal ego, and so each bearer must be part of the group and each donation is an act of social faith” (p.16)
7. What is your advice for an entrepreneur starting out?
Don’t stress out. Get enough sleep, take care of yourself and don’t forget your friends. Keep yourself in a positive mood. It makes it much easier to build connections with others.
8. What’s your favorite entrepreneurship quote?
“I am a laser beam” - Seth Godin
This a great mindset for an entrepreneur to have. The better you can focus and concentrate your efforts, the stronger you’ll be and the farther you’ll go.
CTech Bridgeport Opening Up for Applications
August 11, 2010 at 1:00 am | Posted in Entrepreneurship, General Interest Connecticut | Leave a CommentTags: business incubator, ci, connecticut innovations, ctech, ctech business incubator, university of bridgeport
A couple weeks ago, we did a post on the establishment of third CTech Business Incubator at UConn Health Center in Farmington. Another rumbling among the Connecticut startup community was that the first incubator, located in the Science Park in New Haven, may be relocating in order to accommodate more entrepreneurs in need of office space and resources.
Now there’s news that the third CTech location, at University of Bridgeport, is opening up for applications. Together with the Jobs Bill announced earlier this year, this is another sign that the State of Connecticut is attempting to become more startup friendly. Because incubators supply resources both physically and intellectually, they are popular destinations for startups. Moreover, Connecticut Innovations (CI), Connecticut quasi-governmental investment entity funds the incubator (and also administers some of the programs in the Jobs Bill). So a presence at the incubator may help financially as well.
If you are looking for a home in Connecticut for your venture, you may want to check out the CTech Business Incubator at University of Bridgeport.
Menlo: Will Microsoft Staying in The Mobile Game Be A Good Thing?
August 9, 2010 at 12:53 pm | Posted in Gadgets, Mobile Computing | Leave a CommentAccording to a paper recently published, Microsoft Research has been working away at a product (OS like Android, or integrated device like iPhone remains unclear) which would compete against the iPhone and Android phones on the market. While it may be easy to “poo-hoo” Microsoft (after all, from what seems to be known about the Menlo project, it would simply bring them even with the pack at best, and it is only a research project), that knee-jerk reaction may be misguided.
The first reason it may be is that extremism still seems to be alive and well in technology, just as it is elsewhere – just as there are rabid Republicans out there in the political world, so too are there Democrats foaming at the mouth. So merely the introduction of a similar yet acceptable Microsoft phone would be greeted as manna from heaven from Microsoft lovers and Apple haters.
But it is also important to remember that Microsoft is still a very, very big kid on the block. With some deep pockets. And if you look at the original text of the research paper, you’ll see that their focus seems to be on understanding the architecture of mobile, from the standpoint of mobile/PC interaction, mobile/sensor/surroundings interaction, etc., all focused around end user utility.
ZDnet commentator Mary Jo Foley expects the result will be consistent with Microsoft’s past openness to multiple outside device producers. She thinks that “the Menlo team is continuing to focus on a new mobile operating system — not just the existing Windows Embedded Compact-based ones — that will work on a variety of processors.”
In many ways, just the presence of additional voices in the landscape of mobile computing will benefit the consumer – added competition and innovation will create better products and better prices. And while your technology religion might be strong, over time, good products at good prices tend to trump technology brand affiliations.
(Paper source, “User Experiences with Activity-Based Navigation on Mobile Devices,” Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., Proceedings of MobileHCI 2010, http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/121932/activitybasednavigation%20mobilehci2010.pdf)
(Article source, ZDnet, Microsoft Research shows off a prototype ‘Menlo’ mobile phone,
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-research-shows-off-a-prototype-menlo-mobile-phone/7029?tag=nl.e539)
iPhone 4: You Have To Laugh
August 6, 2010 at 3:00 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a CommentTags: Apple, iphone, spoof
This is the best one since the HTC EVO/iPhone spoof. Beware: It’s a bit racy and contains adult language.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.




